According
to contemporary affective neuroscience, basic human emotions are protocols for
survival and adaptation that we share with other higher apes and mammals
[Panksepp, 1998]. Our basic emotions are processed in our brains in seven
specific subcortical neural systems, although their interaction is mediated at
the cortical level by other cognitive functions (attention, working memory,
representation and planning of goals, etc.). As we all have experienced, there
is only top down control of the emotions when the organism is not under stress
[Panksepp, 1998]. Emotions are directly linked with the homeostasis of the
individual and the social organism, for they deal with answers to vital
problems, and in this sense, they are the result of successful actions of survival which express what we
call intelligence. Emotions are
cognitive actions which follow very clear goals for the organism, so the
separation between emotion and intelligence is basically a theological myth, for
there is a process of continuous rationality among all living beings in
increasing complexification. (I have treated this more extensively somewhere
else[1])
Emotions
give the general semantics for human (and animal) communication, i.e. human
language grew out of the social communication needed for the group homeostasis, and developed itself into ever more complex symbolical constructions which were
useful answers to life problems. Theories of an emotional origin of language
were already given by Epicenus, Lucretius, and in the modern world by Vico,
Rousseau or Darwin, although their concept of emotion was not exactly the one
that today uses neuroscience.
Emotions gave
also the condition of possibility for musical communication, and we can picture
the origin of music as a complexification of human (emotional) communication
through sound, gesture and dance which conveyed socially relevant information,
maternal, sexual, hunting, etc., contributing to the development of the group
identity when enacted in mythico-ritual axes. The progressive complexification
of music runs parallel to the complexification of our emotions, in fact, music
and poetry became the fundamental symbolical tools for the n-aryzation (making
n-ary, using the mathematical terminology) of our basic animal emotions,
defining the identities of the group and the individual.
For more on music and affective neuroscience
see:
Blood,
A.J., Zatorre, R.J., 2001. Intensely
pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions
implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 98, 11818_/11823.
Panksepp, Jaak, [1998]Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of
Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford University Press. New York 1998.
Panksepp,
Jaak and Bernatzky, Günther. [2002]Emotional
sounds and the brain: the neuro-affective foundations of musical appreciation.
Behavioural Processes 60 (2002) 133_/155
[1] Oscar E.
Muñoz. Mitopoética: la construcción
simbólica de la identidad humana. Mandala Ediciones. Madrid. 2013. English translation of the first part Mythopoetics: Mythic Domain. Mandala
Ediciones. Madrid. 2014. On line at: Mythopoetics Review.
No comments:
Post a Comment